Site battle
anthropic.com vs substack.com
Same displayed score, 100. Substack wins this sample: 0% confirmed broken weight vs 0.346%.
Victory applies to the verified sample. Unknown links and pages outside the crawl could change the comparison; coverage is shown for both sides.
Unverified links could reverse this sample lead.
- Link Health Score
- 100/100
- Coverage of discovered links
- 66%
- Not verified
- 386
- Broken links
- 3
- Internal broken
- 2
- External broken
- 1
- Links verified
- 733
- Pages read
- 100
- AI-agent readiness
- 1/3
- Avg response time
- 320 ms
Sample winner
- Link Health Score
- 100/100
- Coverage of discovered links
- 100%
- Not verified
- 0
- Broken links
- 0
- Internal broken
- 0
- External broken
- 0
- Links verified
- 38
- Pages read
- 30
- AI-agent readiness
- 1/3
- Avg response time
- 211 ms
Saved result · 2026-09-06 · standard-v4. This result stays unchanged.
Registering this view…
Other recent battles
AmericanasAvs
SubstackAToo close to call.about 3 hours ago · 3 views
Microsoft(winner)Avs
AppleAMicrosoft wins this sample, 100 to 99.about 3 hours ago · 2 views
Barclays(winner)Avs
AnthropicABarclays wins on measured broken-link rate.about 3 hours ago